The author is either very clever or very dumb, and I honestly can't tell which. She points out that sending a women to deal with another women is sexist. The

The author is either very clever or very dumb, and I honestly can't tell which. She points out that sending a women to deal with another women is sexist. The (presumed) reasoning is that women are people, and shouldn't have be given special treatment (positive or negative). Yet the title of her post SCREAMS "listen to me, because I am a women and for that reason my perspective deserves special treatment". If her perspective has value because she is a women, wouldn't the wife the the founder have the EXACT same additional value of being a women. Again, either super-clever, self-referential and meta, or dense.