6 ms·
Making ubuntu.com responsive
- chris_mahan 13y agoPlain prerendered html5 with no JS was not available?
- JetSpiegel 13y agoWhere's the framework for that?
- chris_mahan 13y agothe great text files framework.
- JetSpiegel 13y agoAnd its IDE, vim.
- chris_mahan 13y agoI prefer nano, as it reminds me to keep the files short.
- Daviey 13y agofenchurch
- FooBarWidget 13y agoWhat makes you think www.ubuntu.com is not prerendered html5?
- chris_mahan 13y agoAnd since http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-responsive/index.html http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon... goes 404, I assume there's a handler that built the page on the fly. No?
- tych0 13y agoNo, e.g. I use this rule in my .htaccess on my blog: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*\.html$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html Which means you can access: http://tycho.ws/music http://tycho.ws/music or http://tycho.ws/music.html http://tycho.ws/music.html
- chris_mahan 13y agook, so where's the .html file for that page?
- chris_mahan 13y agoI went to http://www.canonical.com/index.html http://www.canonical.com/index.html and there was a 404. Surely there should be something there...
- chris_mahan 13y agoThere's also no robots.txt... Odd for a static site don't you think?
- tych0 13y agoI suppose it isn't obvious from the rule I gave, but it doesn't necessarily have to even be web accessible. Why does it matter so much anyway?
- chris_mahan 13y agoThe page: http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-responsive/ http://design.canonical.com/2014/03/making-ubuntu-com-respon... Shows as 112 KB by lori in FF. Really? 1/10 MB for a page of text?
- tvxedoman 13y agojQuery was probably already cached on your end, all 300kb of it
- chris_mahan 13y agoYes, probably. but that means there is still 100+KB being sent over the wire each time...
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]