4 ms·
"offered no actual evidence" First hand testimony might be imperfect, but It is evidence. Whether or not its conclusive remains to be seen. That's the larger
by 001sky 13y ago
"offered no actual evidence"
First hand testimony might be imperfect, but It is evidence.
Whether or not its conclusive remains to be seen.
That's the larger point.
Certainly, the above linked article lends at least some credibility to some claims.
The fact that the wife of a founder needed to <even be mentioned> in this type of PR damage controll manouvre...is a huge red flag by itself.
- throwaway092834 13y agoThe wife was mentioned because she was called out in the earlier article as a problem. We don't know if she was actually a problem or not. We, and specifically you, don't know enough to make the claims you're making. Please, stop speculating. Have patience, wait for actual information.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]