3 ms·
Indeed, but it takes time to clean up a culture (if it's at all possible). This response suggests that their HR hire is doing his or her job well, at least now
by duncan_bayne 13y ago
Indeed, but it takes time to clean up a culture (if it's at all possible). This response suggests that their HR hire is doing his or her job well, at least now.
- 001sky 13y agoThis response suggests that ... Disagree. The situtation is highly ambiguous. HR is a game of "the best victories are wars not fought". And so in some regards, its too late. On the other-hand, if HR was on the right...they were "over-ruled" by more than one of CEO/founders/sr execs. This surely means this person has diminished capacity to act. If not due to competence, than due to "lack of formiddableness". Because it shouldn't take a public PR nightmare to convince (ie, show some leadership) that following HR101 is a good idea. It is only the rare edge case that this person was in perfect pitch (and ignored) yesterday and will be held in higher regard tomorrow. So, this is why things are not clear cut here for anyone.