3 ms·
> I am aware that other companies have done this, but I find it a bit slimy. Well, it's not written that charities must be above slimy behavior. It's also not
by lutusp 13y ago
> I am aware that other companies have done this, but I find it a bit slimy.
Well, it's not written that charities must be above slimy behavior. It's also not written that all organizations that call themselves charities are actually charities. It's well-established that an organization that calls itself a charity can social-engineer people into doing things they wouldn't otherwise do.
Here is the Better Business Bureau's listing for GiveForward -- in a nutshell, no serious problems:
http://www.bbb.org/chicago/business-reviews/fund-raising-counselors-and-orgs/giveforward-in-chicago-il-88367699 http://www.bbb.org/chicago/business-reviews/fund-raising-cou...
But I should warn you that some people adopt the name of a legitimate charity to scam people.
- unclebucknasty 13y agoWell, they're not a charity (in the strict non-profit sense) and don't claim to be one. But, you know, when you claim to exist for social good, then you should probably expect to be held to a higher standard. But, FWIW, I don't think GiveForward is out to overtly scam people. I just personally find their model distasteful. The extortionate racket that is the BBB, on the other hand, is among the slimiest out there.