Oddly enough the author brings up some good points, but wow, 500 words where 1 would do. Various bits that stereotype males. The ideals[0] of equality state th

Oddly enough the author brings up some good points, but wow, 500 words where 1 would do. Various bits that stereotype males. The ideals[0] of equality state that every person is an individual unto themselves, and should be evaluated and communicated with as such. Creating a group to stereotype by focusing on a singular attribute is foolish at best, and dangerous at worst. All that said, some good points about the coopting of sub-culture and the problems with men being disallowed to express their feelings contributing to some social ills. The author also uses the phrase "women's culture", which as a believed in transhumanist philosophies I question. Again, it is creating a hard dividing line based upon some physical characteristic, physical characteristics that that hopefully one day will be as fluid as code. [0] And yes, needless to say, this goes both ways.