4 ms·
@LeaVerou's points all seem pretty spot on to me. It may be that @nrrdcore was harassed, but again, we don't have too much solid information in front of us. Jum
by krrishd 13y ago
@LeaVerou's points all seem pretty spot on to me. It may be that @nrrdcore was harassed, but again, we don't have too much solid information in front of us. Jumping to conclusions, both about @nrrrdcore and Github does not make any sense, yet here we are doing it, why? Because one of the parties involved is a female. I don't mean to sound insensitive here, but isn't that what sexism is? Basing our judgement based on gender? We should be waiting for the facts and evidence here.
EDIT: And I just want to say, if @nrrdcore is right which she very well may be, then I agree that she should speak out. But we shouldn't be judging the situation until we have hard facts.
- dominotw 13y agoNot jumping to conclusions is a form of jumping to conclusion.
- jsmthrowaway 13y agoI'm sorry, but that is some straight 1984 blackwhite shit. There is no way around calling it that.
- ephemeralgomi 13y agoNo, you're absolutely wrong.
- harshreality 13y agoHow, then, does one avoid jumping to conclusions? By taking the word of whoever first goes public over an incident? Right.