4 ms·
She is a person who thinks that Adria Richards of donglegate did nothing wrong. She is public friends with a group of high functioning SJWs (and for this reaso
by Tohhou 13y ago
She is a person who thinks that Adria Richards of donglegate did nothing wrong.
She is public friends with a group of high functioning SJWs (and for this reason stay the fuck away from them unless you want to be character assassinated - they are throwing that around a lot right now) who think GitHub of all places is the pinnacle of misogynistic, explicitly female hating culture. If that's GitHub then truly tech is doomed, but then again this is SJW world where any mostly male environment is a hostile work environment, where things like libertarianism is hated because they don't value equality of opportunity and instead demand equality of outcome irregardless of merit. They think that feelings, that status matters more than results... you know, building things, making the world a better place one little thing at a time instead of always being on complaining.
Internet trolls being assholes has nothing to do with sexism. People who feed the trolls, who are male and female, get burned. Let the idiots burn. And yeah I've been called a gender traitor by the SJW idiots because I don't agree with their idea that feminism = females.
- dominotw 13y agoWhat is SJW?
- jedanbik 13y agoMaybe you could take a step back and examine your own hostility here in this comment?
- Tohhou 13y agoTo use their own phrasing, I won't be tone policed, thanks. If you have something specific to say in regards to the content of my post then say it. My irreverence toward SJWism has been earned.
- etherael 13y agoYou know, I really hate it that those two pieces of information alone are almost enough to make me outright dismiss the chance this person has anything sane to say, but SJW are just so damned toxic and clearly feel no need to alter course that I simply cannot view it any other way. It's a special shame, because I imagine if someone were a predator and wanted to pick victims who would be unlikely to be taken seriously, that entire SJW milieu would be ripe grounds for such victim hunting. Anything any of them say will be immediately assumed to be wildly exaggerated hysterical nonsense, because almost everything they say is exactly that. I wonder if they realise just how much they're shooting themselves in the foot and enabling their "oppressors".
- malandrew 13y ago"demand equality of outcome" Interesting way to phrase things since ultimately that's what the employers that SJWs work for expect as well. Except that the equality of outcome expected by their employers is the quality of the work product produced, and that that is secondary to the outcome they expect from their workplaces. Unless explicitly part of the creation mythology of the organization, pretty much all profit-seeking enterprise came into being to solve a problem that produces profit, not solve the problem of social justice. Anyone joining such organizations, expecting that equality of outcome with respect to their social cause of choice is the goal is quite frankly delusional. I would imagine that they are often blind to areas in which their demand for equality of outcome for their social cause might be at odds with the expectation of equality of outcome with respect to work product that increases the value of the enterprise. If you want to be part of a profit-seeking enterprise that balances equality of outcome of social justice and work product that adds value, then you probably need to create just an enterprise yourself instead of joining existing enterprises that don't explicitly share your goals and complaining years after discovering that they don't. (PS. "regardless" not "irregardless")
- Tohhou 13y ago>(PS. "regardless" not "irregardless") Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Many incorrect words are common in my area's dialect.