3 ms·
That there is foreign interference and influence in those protests is a given (and from everywhere, not only the US), but I really dislike when people reduce th
by nolok 13y ago
That there is foreign interference and influence in those protests is a given (and from everywhere, not only the US), but I really dislike when people reduce those protests to only that. That's like saying the US independence war was only a power struggle between France and the UK, it's true that it was that in part, and it's true that without France's support the US wouldn't have won, but it was much more than only a conflict between the two European countries.
And it's the same with all those revolts that you clump up together as if it's only the US/West wish and doing.
I realize the US example is not perfectly the same, but you get the gist of what I'm saying. And I also realize you didn't explicitly say it was "only" US/west actions, but the way you phrased your post didn't leave much ambiguity on what you meant.
- thisiswrong 13y ago> That's like saying the US independence war was only a power struggle between France and the UK It's not at all the same. Your example is from the ages of monarchies fighting each other through open warfare for control of land, trade routes, and slaves. Now we live in the ages of obscure plutocrats playing a tug of war to control lucrative energy markets using discrete paramilitary tactics (CIA activities) and tight media control (MSM fear-mongering, sock puppets, 'grass-root' campains...) to rally the masses behind them.