11 ms·
In Sandberg-style liberal feminism (which preserves inequality except for the more well-off white women and therefore doesn't help all women), I can imagine the
by calibraxis 13y ago
In Sandberg-style liberal feminism (which preserves inequality except for the more well-off white women and therefore doesn't help all women), I can imagine they want to improve subordination to female bosses. So you should be ready to follow her imperatives like you would Zuckerberg's.
In corporations, boss subordination is so complete that "bossy" only applies to someone who isn't actually literally a boss. So I can imagine "bossy" is used to question the legitimacy of female bosses. However, more serious kinds of feminism directly attack the existence of bosses, since many more women are at the bottom of hierarchies than the top.
- Dewie 13y ago> However, more serious kinds of feminism directly attack the existence of bosses, since many more women are at the bottom of hierarchies than the top. That's how hierarchies tend to be structured. :)
- vanderZwan 13y agoI think the implication was relative to men...
- _delirium 13y agoI found this critique along those lines interesting: http://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/feminisms-tipping-point-who-wins-from-leaning-in http://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/feminisms-tip...
- hga 13y agoIn alignment with your observation, this campaign is thought by some to be battlespace preparation for Hillary's 2016 presidential campaign.