3 ms·
Perhaps the plaintiff should be required to contribute all the legal fees for the defendant (up to a maximum). If the defendant loses the lawsuit, he must pay t
by frogpelt 13y ago
Perhaps the plaintiff should be required to contribute all the legal fees for the defendant (up to a maximum). If the defendant loses the lawsuit, he must pay the plaintiff back for his own legal fees in addition to the damages that he must pay.
- couchand 13y agoThat would be great except the defendant still has to pay up front.
- ElDiablo666 13y agoActually it's not great since a disproportionate part of the outcome of legal proceedings is luck, just like all of life.
- seferphier 13y agolegal proceedings works - just that it is really really expensive. Justice is expensive.
- camillomiller 13y agoWhat about this: you drag me to court, you ask me X millions in damages; if you lose, you owe me X millions. Now that's a lawsuit I would pay for upfront if I think I'm in the right. Even better: many lawyers would probably fight to get my profitable suit pro-bono so they can cash in a big chunk of the eventual damages I would get.
- nitrogen 13y agoI've suggested before in other threads that legal fees should be contributed to a shared pool and divided equally between both parties, with some minimum contribution set based on income and net worth. This would allow a defendant who is decidedly in the right to survive an attack by a significantly larger plaintiff.