5 ms·
Occam's razor, the plane exploded in mid air. Not even time to mayday.
by Thiz 13y ago
Occam's razor, the plane exploded in mid air.
Not even time to mayday.
- cavejohnson 13y agoHow does that explain the four hours of satellite pings after the transponders cut out?
- LoganCale 13y agoNo. The latest evidence shows that it flew on for hours afterwards and continued responding to satellite pings. If it exploded at the point where the transponder went offline, debris would have been found in that area by now.
- logicallee 13y agoOccam's razor is that nuclear power plants don't exist, they're just coal power plants (which already existed) with a story about nuclear power being possible. After all, do you have any idea how complicated controlled fission would have to be? It's easier if it doesn't exist. The problem with this "theory" is that it doesn't explain all the evidence. Sure, a hijack would have to be way more complicated than a mid-air explosion, just like a nuclear power plant would have to be way more complicated. But a complicated set of transponders turning off with sudden radio silence is exactly what happened. Plus, if it was a mid-air explosion - where are the pieces?
- wcummings 13y ago>Occam's razor is that nuclear power plants don't exist, they're just coal power plants (which already existed) with a story about nuclear power being possible. After all, do you have any idea how complicated controlled fission would have to be? It's easier if it doesn't exist This is ridiculous. An elaborate conspiracy to fool people into believing in nuclear power isn't simple at all. Not to mention events like Chernobyl
- mason240 13y agoYeah, Occam's Razor in that scenario would be that the nuclear power are real.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- tomelders 13y agoOccams razor "states that among competing hypotheses, the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions should be selected". What you've done is make a wild assumption, that would require a lot more assumptions to be true in order for your exploding plane theory to be true. Which is about as far away from Occam's Razor as you can get. I wish people would stop saying "Occams Razor" and then inserting any old jibber they want, because they feel they've apparently qualified it by saying Occams Razor, even though they have no idea what Occam's Razor actually is. It's lazy and hollow reasoning.
- Thiz 13y agoOccam's razor, motherfuckers, Occam's razor!