I coined the following inversion to highlight the inherently manipulative use of the no-I-in-team saw: There may be no 'I' in 'team,' but you can't spell 'team

I coined the following inversion to highlight the inherently manipulative use of the no-I-in-team saw: There may be no 'I' in 'team,' but you can't spell 'team' without 'me.' Am I the only one who sees the no-I-in-team chestnut as obviously manipulative? Not to mention, there was a great article about solo entrepreneurs on HN a while ago that, I think, is something of an existence counter-proof of this article.