4 ms·
It's excellent in GCC and clang. GCC 4.8.1 was feature complete. GCC C++11 status: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.ht
by agwa 13y ago
It's excellent in GCC and clang. GCC 4.8.1 was feature complete.
GCC C++11 status: http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html
MSVC is not as good. I don't have any links handy, but anecdotally it still fails to compile some of my code that compiles fine in GCC.
- jarjoura 13y agoMicrosoft should join the LLVM group and just port any MSVC extension not supported in clang over already. :-)
- jzwinck 13y agoGCC 4.8 (and even earlier) has <regex> but it doesn't actually work. I guess it will work in 4.9, but haven't gotten to try it. This glaring omission somehow didn't make the list you linked, which is otherwise exceedingly comprehensive.
- agwa 13y agoGood point, I guess that table only shows language features. Here's the library features table: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.200x http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#s... Not feature complete if you take that into account, I'm afraid.