I agree with all of your points, thanks for chiming in. It just seems odd to me that the article cites Metro's adoption as "flat" based on "less than 1000" dai

I agree with all of your points, thanks for chiming in. It just seems odd to me that the article cites Metro's adoption as "flat" based on "less than 1000" daily Metro users versus "millions" of prerelease Firefox users when the product wasn't marketed or widely available - the comparison is so unfair that that particular data feels like fluff. It sounds like the actual decision to pull the plug was made using both a critical eye on the market and much better data than the anecdote from the article would lead one to believe.