12 ms·
Also hosting static files is probably the easiest thing to do with your web app. So why introduce another point of failure for something really easy? You may
by cyberpanther 13y ago
Also hosting static files is probably the easiest thing to do with your web app. So why introduce another point of failure for something really easy? You may save a few milliseconds but definitely not worth it in my opinion. I'd rather have better control and if you really want to speed things up then combine and minify all your static assets.
- AdrianRossouw 13y agoyeah. which is why the only time i think it's reasonable is on something like jsfiddle, where you can't host the files.
- lerouxb 13y agoYeah chances are you're already running a static webserver of some kind anyway. Typically at least apache or nginx proxying things to your app.