3 ms·
It still surprises me when I hear this, but then again, I've been a user since the early days. I think the main reason that it's survived is the user community.
by face_melt 13y ago
It still surprises me when I hear this, but then again, I've been a user since the early days. I think the main reason that it's survived is the user community. There are vast treasure troves of (usually) high quality music a query away. I still hit up the chat rooms occasionally for listening suggestions.
If you're not into scouring trackers or music blogs for more "obscure" tastes, or even if you used the program before it was ported to the QT framework, I would recommend you check it out!
- mahouse 13y agoThe Qt port suffers from grave quality issues, imo. I still use the old version.
- pcf 13y agoOn the Mac it works brilliantly. I don't know about the QT port on PC, but I would assume it has surpassed the old client by now, after all these updates.
- mahouse 13y agoI guess it's the same, because it's Qt anyway. The UI, for example, looked very bad. But I tried it a while ago, maybe it has improved a lot since then. On Linux, btw, I recommend Nicotine+.