3 ms·
Unfortunately there may not be a "good" reason. It's not hard for me to imagine that someone could do it for kicks, or perhaps to test some new attack vectors
by Zikes 13y ago
Unfortunately there may not be a "good" reason. It's not hard for me to imagine that someone could do it for kicks, or perhaps to test some new attack vectors against a reasonably hardened target.
- ansible 13y agoIt's not hard for me to imagine that someone could do it for kicks, or perhaps to test some new attack vectors against a reasonably hardened target. Though when you try out a new attack vector, the community (hopefully) publishes enough details about the attack to help the next target more effectively deal with that particular attack. If someone is attacking whitehouse.gov or a similar target, I somewhat understand their reasons why (though I don't agree with them). github.com, on the other hand, while a for-profit corporation, is also a valuable bit of Internet infrastructure that makes the world a better place. Attacking targets like github.com, Wikipedia, and others helps no one, and forwards no coherent political agenda. So I'm going with the "for kicks" / jerkwad theory.