3 ms·
don't take things black and white. lets say if you don't have 90% comprehension you're not reading it. Argumenting for the sake of argumenting like you just di
by zobzu 13y ago
don't take things black and white.
lets say if you don't have 90% comprehension you're not reading it.
Argumenting for the sake of argumenting like you just did is a waste of time, IMO. It's generally called nitpicking.
- XorNot 13y agoThis we actually can measure - speech recognition's comprehension rate is a big problem for its implementation. So we know 80% accuracy is not good enough to produce cogent sentences (1 miss in every 5 words). And we know 1 miss in every 10 still doesn't produce something we'd think of as accurate. So I'd say you need about 90%+ comprehension to actually comprehend something. But that's leaving a lot of room for error anyway - how much stuff have you read and then thought "wait, what was the modifier to that specific phrase?"