3 ms·
I thought part of it was so they could use the same fleet of buses for HS/JHS/Primary.
by rdl 13y ago
I thought part of it was so they could use the same fleet of buses for HS/JHS/Primary.
- dTal 13y agoHmm, they definitely did do that. But couldn't they do that anyway if all the schools were at the same time? Admittedly you've have high schoolers and first graders on the same bus, but it would certainly save on fuel...
- Spig 13y agoThree separate trips means a third the number of buses to service the same number of people (assuming equal distribution). And a third the number of drivers/etc.
- ANTSANTS 13y agoThat is a good reason to stagger school starting times. It doesn't explain the need to make HS and JHS start so early, or why on earth they would start earlier than primary school when young children tend to wake up earlier than teenagers anyway. 7:30 for primary/elementary school and 8:30 for HS and JHS would have been great (or maybe even 8 and 9 respectively), but I suppose some kids skipping class after their parents had left for work would ruin it for everyone. EDIT: How much do you think reusing the bus fleets actually saves? Compared to have one big fleet that transports all schools at the same time, you need less buses, and probably save a little by paying less drivers for more time, but I'd expect the cost of fuel to dominate, which should be about the same regardless. Operating more busses also means that each is sustaining less wear per day as well.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]