3 ms·
Details details. Well first they would need physical access and then they would also need to know which drive number was owned by which person (not super diffic
by larrys 13y ago
Details details. Well first they would need physical access and then they would also need to know which drive number was owned by which person (not super difficult for sure but a system could be designed where it was more "swiss" in style of identification) and then they would have to break the encryption if they gained access.
I am not and wasn't specifically doing this for NSA reasons more
just typical reasons why you wanted to keep an offsite backup and not
have it on the same drive (and mounted) in a way that would make it
less likely to get taken by hackers because it wasn't physically connected
to the network.
So the question is, what is more secure (and not saying there aren't
drawbacks..)
- Files stored by google, dropbox whatever
- Files stored at your aunt's
- Files stored in a secure data center only physically mounted at specific
times (1 time every 2 weeks say) and otherwise in a locked vault identified by number.
Needing ssh key to gain access which only you have. And only you know the time
it will be mounted for that matter. And maybe a text message back to your cell
as well (how is all of that for security by obscurity?)
For that matter safe deposit boxes aren't that expensive if
you have a local bank you could simply store a clone copy of your
drive there and it would be essentially safe from fire, theft
and the NSA since they wouldn't know it was there to even gain
(legal) access to it, right?
- brador 13y agoIf the intent is to make an offline backup that can't be found easily you could just dig a hole in your local park. If it's a backup of, say, customer details, that you need access to update sometimes, then the best option would be client side encryption with a cloud drive. The rest is a magic show of busy work that achieves no additional goals.