4 ms·
Time for a reality check. Okay, so I like the idea of CoinMD. It's a nice way for people with medical knowledge to get paid for their tips, but so far that's r
by vezzy-fnord 13y ago
Time for a reality check.
Okay, so I like the idea of CoinMD. It's a nice way for people with medical knowledge to get paid for their tips, but so far that's really about it. It's just yet another forum for medical advice, but with a gimmick. It's not even an original gimmick. The whole "integrate Bitcoin into everything" appears to be motivated by more of a cargo cult to appear modern and countercultural than anything rational.
However, it does offer an alternative payment system and in this case it works, so I won't complain about that.
But can we please let go of these childish fantasies that Bitcoin will overthrow all government and usher us into an anarchist utopia of voluntaryism and global human liberation? Those kinds of libertarian/anarchist pipe dreams were excusable during the very beginning of Bitcoin, when the protocol was still being sharpened and everyone was enthusiastic about this new idea.
I don't know what kind of world the author lives in where he thinks people posting textual descriptions of their conditions on the Internet, backed by a digital currency, will revamp the healthcare system into an anarcho-capitalist institution and turn government irrelevant? What bullshit. Do I seriously need to explain that writing about your condition isn't enough to get diagnosed with anything beyond the most rudimentary of advice ("This might be that, but I'm not sure. Go see a doctor and try this herb in the meantime to see if it stops.")?
Bitcoin will not render government irrelevant. You see, the thing is that even if the concept of Bitcoin theoretically can allow financial independence from the state, it's completely meaningless when your ecosystem is a mess. The Bitcoin ecosystem, as we have witnessed so many times, is absolute chaotic mayhem that can ironically only be controlled through state regulation, which many hardcore Bitcoiners are advocating for.
Homeschooling is opting out of the state? Uh, last I checked, homeschooling requires one to be registered with the state, as well as offer vigorous and regular checks with it to ensure you're in line.
The Silk Road isn't any different from your standard drug dealing market, only it's online and just as volatile and unreliable as the physical thing.
Look, Bitcoin is certainly capable of great things, but these here are just naive pipe dreams.
- eli5 13y agoSo, do you think that if enough people want to peacefully live without government interference at all (e.g. without a government) they don't deserve to do so and they don't deserve, for example, to be sold a piece of land to completely secede from state?
- chimeracoder 13y agoThat's a very loaded (but easy) question. In the United States, we fought an entire war over the question of whether or not a state had the authority to secede from the federal government (the Union). The seceding states lost that fight. It would be very hard to argue that individuals have that right when the states do not. You may wish that it were different, but the fact is that individuals do not have this right, according to virtually any constitutional interpretation since the mid-19th century.
- wyager 13y ago>In the United States, we fought an entire war over the question of whether or not a state had the authority to secede from the federal government (the Union). The seceding states lost that fight. So wars decide what is right and what is wrong?
- aidenn0 13y agoIt's not about right and wrong, it's about what you can and can't do. If you do something and the US decides to go to war with you over it, you are SOL. Philosphers may claim you have a natural right to buy and consume drugs the US government considers illegal, since you aren't harming others; you can then scream about your natrual rights from prison all you want.
- ameister14 13y agoThat's a perfectly valid way to decide what is right and wrong. A couple hundred years ago they would call it an "appeal to God."
- lotsofmangos 13y agoNo, they decide who is left.
- eli5 13y agoHow come you consider this not to be people's right? Simply because someone lost a war over this issue doesn't mean this issue is resolved. I and many people don't want states to tell us how to live our lives. On what grounds do you find it moral to impose your rules and tax burden on such a group of people if these people simply want to be left alone don't bother you at all?