4 ms·

I doubt you really got "decent coverage" at that price, and I expect even at $680 the coverage will magically evaporate if shit hits the fan. That said, you've

I doubt you really got "decent coverage" at that price, and I expect even at $680 the coverage will magically evaporate if shit hits the fan. That said, you've taken your own unusually strong position, observed that the ACA didn't change it, and extrapolated to all entrepreneurs. What does "entrepreneur" mean to you, exactly? Is "healthy and financially secure" a prerequisite in your view? I also don't know what "tons of forms" you're talking about, since that hasn't been the case in any situation I've personally observed since the beginning of the year, but you've now said you're in Texas, which is actively trying to thwart the ACA, so is even less likely to be representative.

jandrewrogers 13y ago
Whether or not $680 is "decent coverage" for a family of 4 depends on age and perhaps the state you live in. Assuming that the family is young, that would buy one of the better pre-ACA plans in my state (Washington). I have no idea how old the parent is. Of course, that won't buy a comparable post-ACA plan. The ACA rather dramatically increased the costs of insurance even for plans that were unchanged by the ACA (~35% more at my current startup for the same plan). Other startups I know faced similar cost increases, which makes the argument that the ACA helps startups dubious.
- gcb0 13y ago
  So you're saying that having a lower change of shit hitting the fan make for a better case of buying plans that disappear when shit hits the fan? Mindblowing.