3 ms·

Apple ignores Java developers with Leopard

12 points by jsjenkins168 19y ago

chaostheory 19y ago
well for a contrarian view (correct me if I'm wrong) besides OS X, I don't know of any other OS other than Solaris that actually ships with Java or includes it with the OS's updates. Neither Windows nor Linux does this (or has this changed since Java went open source?). Both users and developers on those platforms have to download java separately (unless the OEM PC maker has a deal with Sun). Not to mention that most companies that use Java, typical stay one version behind the latest one anyways, to make transition from one version to another as painless as possible.
- michaelneale 19y ago
  Fedora does (or will, at least with F8). And OSX never shipped in line with java versions - it has its own schedule of course. I don't know what all the fuss is about. People can still run what they run now.
- Tichy 19y ago
  I guess the issue is that there is no Java 6 you could install on Leopard. For other platforms Sun has been the provider of Java, but for OS X Apple provided it themselves.
- davidw 19y ago
  It's pretty easy to get Java on Ubuntu.
  - chaostheory 19y ago
    the question isn't whether it's easy to get java on 'x' OS. the question is whether it already ships with it... it may be easy for developers to do it, but we often forget about the average consumer/user (not to mention update it)
jawngee 19y ago
I'm so sick and tired of reading about this shit - pardon my french. D-Zone has been plagued with the most pathetic whining I've seen on blogs for a long time. STFU already, it's going to be coming. Soon. PS. Isn't this Sun's responsibility anyways?
boris 19y ago
So much for run anywhere. Seriously, perhaps Apple is trying to discourage people from developing MacOS applications using Java in order not to make the whole experience appear slow. Their OS is already quite inefficient (which, BTW, makes me wonder why on earth anybody would make a Mac their development machine).
- jmzachary 19y ago
  "which, BTW, makes me wonder why on earth anybody would make a Mac their development machine" Because a development platform and deployment platform can be two different platforms.
  - boris 19y ago
    And why would you choose the slower one for development then?
  - geebee 19y ago
    Macs make good development machines if your production machines are also UNIX based. Even if my code is truly platform-independent, I still find it easier when I don't have to mentally switch back and forth between windows and unix. Of course, I also find Unix to be a much more powerful environment. That said, I also haven't found speed to be a problem on my mac (it is slower than the windows laptop that my work gave me, but it's also an older machine). Of course, this only addresses Mac vs Windows - the argument becomes less compelling if you're comparing it to linux. I'm not sophisticated enough with Unix to appreciate the differences between linux and bsd, but I do like the Mac UI, and unlike windows, I get a unix prompt, which is pretty tremendous.

12 points by jsjenkins168 19y ago

well for a contrarian view (correct me if I'm wrong) besides OS X, I don't know of any other OS other than Solaris that actually ships with Java or includes it with the OS's updates. Neither Windows nor Linux does this (or has this changed since Java went open source?). Both users and developers on those platforms have to download java separately (unless the OEM PC maker has a deal with Sun). Not to mention that most companies that use Java, typical stay one version behind the latest one anyways, to make transition from one version to another as painless as possible.

michaelneale 19y ago
Fedora does (or will, at least with F8). And OSX never shipped in line with java versions - it has its own schedule of course. I don't know what all the fuss is about. People can still run what they run now.
Tichy 19y ago
I guess the issue is that there is no Java 6 you could install on Leopard. For other platforms Sun has been the provider of Java, but for OS X Apple provided it themselves.
davidw 19y ago
It's pretty easy to get Java on Ubuntu.
- chaostheory 19y ago
  the question isn't whether it's easy to get java on 'x' OS. the question is whether it already ships with it... it may be easy for developers to do it, but we often forget about the average consumer/user (not to mention update it)

jawngee 19y ago

I'm so sick and tired of reading about this shit - pardon my french. D-Zone has been plagued with the most pathetic whining I've seen on blogs for a long time. STFU already, it's going to be coming. Soon. PS. Isn't this Sun's responsibility anyways?

boris 19y ago

So much for run anywhere. Seriously, perhaps Apple is trying to discourage people from developing MacOS applications using Java in order not to make the whole experience appear slow. Their OS is already quite inefficient (which, BTW, makes me wonder why on earth anybody would make a Mac their development machine).

jmzachary 19y ago
"which, BTW, makes me wonder why on earth anybody would make a Mac their development machine" Because a development platform and deployment platform can be two different platforms.
- boris 19y ago
  And why would you choose the slower one for development then?
- geebee 19y ago
  Macs make good development machines if your production machines are also UNIX based. Even if my code is truly platform-independent, I still find it easier when I don't have to mentally switch back and forth between windows and unix. Of course, I also find Unix to be a much more powerful environment. That said, I also haven't found speed to be a problem on my mac (it is slower than the windows laptop that my work gave me, but it's also an older machine). Of course, this only addresses Mac vs Windows - the argument becomes less compelling if you're comparing it to linux. I'm not sophisticated enough with Unix to appreciate the differences between linux and bsd, but I do like the Mac UI, and unlike windows, I get a unix prompt, which is pretty tremendous.