3 ms·
Hey man what are you doing! We can finally use our devices during take off and now you hint at keeping them off permanently! Eek! :P I'm sure the first battery
by rschmitty 13y ago
Hey man what are you doing! We can finally use our devices during take off and now you hint at keeping them off permanently! Eek! :P
I'm sure the first battery meltdown/fire on a plane is going to cause a riot in the news but the odds...
- jfoster 13y agoThat did cross my mind when I posted it. I should point out that I don't know what is true. It just seems to be a contradiction that every passenger can take on board and use whatever they want in-flight, yet transponders specially engineered to be safe on a plane must be able to be disabled. I suspect the answer is that the transponder doesn't need to be under the control of anyone on the plane.
- ZoF 13y agoThe answer is that when there's 100+ planes parked at an airport it's confusing to have 100's of transponders on as other planes are trying to land.
- walshemj 13y agoso just have a load cells on the undercarriage and a circuit that detects when a plane is landed so that you can only turn off the transponder when the plane is landed.
- DEinspanjer 13y agoMaybe it has to do with the location on the transponder? A laptop in baggage or an electrical component buried deep in the bowels of the plane would be hard to get to in the event of a potential fire. A passenger's laptop would be fairly easy to put out with a fire extinguisher.
- noselasd 13y agoThis device is a bigger piece of equipment using more power, with physical interconnects to other areas on a plan. Moreover it normally not located a place where you can lift it up and throw it in a bucket of water, or rip out its battery if something should go wrong.