3 ms·
Edit: deleted hostile, snarky content.
by mootothemax 13y ago
Edit: deleted hostile, snarky content.
- wilg 13y agoI think you're being unfairly hostile and snarky here. This isn't a good way to get your point across.
- mootothemax 13y agoI think you're being unfairly hostile and snarky here. This isn't a good way to get your point across. Thanks for calling me out on that, you're right.
- hueving 13y ago>Can you explain which one it is? Did it cross your mind that it could be a combination of them? Drop the accusatory tone when you don't understand the content. International flights have higher standards due to extended distances from emergency landing sites. An old plane is not exempt from the check standards, but the age certainly means that there is an increased probability of failures. >If so, at what airframe age, or travel standard, or aircraft size does that kick in? Again, sarcasm is really unhelpful when it's just a result of you lashing out at a comment you didn't understand.
- mootothemax 13y agoDid it cross your mind that it could be a combination of them? Drop the accusatory tone when you don't understand the content. Do you not see the irony in writing an accusatory reply to me? ;-) To your main point, I understand the content; I do, however, resent people boldly stating "that can't happen, it's too unlikely," only to then say "Oh, right, yeah, if you exclude old planes, domestic flights and blah blah blah blah blah." I do concede that it would be more helpful if I was less of an arse about it though.