4 ms·

So like I said in another comment, it would be the state-by-another-name that would sending someone to arrest me for paying someone to write code on my computer

• dragonwriter 13y ago
  No, it would be the state-by-exactly-that-name enforcing whatever the rule was, which quite likely wouldn't be by arresting you for paying someone to write code on your computer, as that wouldn't actually address the issue with property relationship that Marxism is directed at (whereas redistributing the economic gains from that work would address that issue.)
• dllthomas 13y ago
  It seems like just a collective refusal to enforce contracts that involve rents, while enforcing contracts that don't, would do a lot to put society on a Marxist footing (leaving aside entirely the question of whether that's a good idea - I'm somewhat inclined to say that it's not).