4 ms·
Firefox OS has been launched in 16 countries. You may not be on an emerging market but people on most of these countries are enjoying what affordable smartphone
by soapdog 13y ago
Firefox OS has been launched in 16 countries. You may not be on an emerging market but people on most of these countries are enjoying what affordable smartphones can give them. In Venezuela alone Firefox OS already has a larger marketshare than Windows Phone. Firefox OS went from 0 to 16 countries, 4 hardware manufacturers and 4 global telecoms in 2 years. And it did that while being open, accepting contribution, encouraging sharing and open culture, placing privacy and values over profits. Yes, Android and iOS are larger, much much larger, but we need to think what kind of world do we want in ten years. A world where each mobile device is a silo with its platform under complete draconian control of a single company thats usually from the northern region of California or where each platform is embracing open standards, where apps are light and cross platform where people can go from consuming content to creating content fairly easy (HTML being way easier to learn than Obj-C).
There is a reason why we're using the World Wide Web right now. Its not an app. Its an ecosystem based on standards where everyone agrees more or less to play by the same rules. Its also easy to learn so anyone can put anything online, it doesn't matter if you're building a home page about crappy gingerbread people, you don't need permission from Apple or Google or a lot of knowledge to do it. The Web won as main medium to exchange stuff because its easy and open.
Initiatives such as NaCL and similar are not open. ASM.js based stuff work even on platforms that doesn't support it. Its about being compatible and playing well with others.
Mozilla is a strong player and it is not playing a game where the others need to lose for it to win. Its playing a game where cooperation is the main objective. Firefox OS doesn't need to win, it just need to show people that you can do whatever you need using web technologies that don't belong in a silo.
Sorry if this sounds like a rant but I get really frustrated when people seem to be content to throw all the advancements we did for the web during the last 20 years into something as shallow as user base numbers.
Four years ago no one could believe that a whole OS could be built on top of a web engine. That browser would be able to play AAA games without plugins. That we could do videoconferences using p2p with nothing but HTML/CSS/JS and yet we can. Now, put your imagination and dreams to work and imagine what the next four years will bring. Thing a bit longer and imagine what could happen if instead of trying to embrace proprietary tech we decided to move the web forward...
- nnethercote 13y agoWell said. Anyone who thinks Firefox OS is going nowhere obviously wasn't paying attention to Mobile World Congress 2013 and 2014.
- pjmlp 13y ago> Four years ago no one could believe that a whole OS could be built on top of a web engine. I think most people do remember WebOS.
- Pacabel 13y agoThose arguments aren't very convincing. Launching in just 16 out of 190+ countries isn't very impressive. That's well under 10% of the entire world. Likewise, having more market share than the 4th or 5th place competitor, but still being significantly far behind the leaders, isn't very impressive either. It's even less impressive when this is in a rather small and irrelevant market. And the web argument isn't very good, either, given that Android, iOS, BlackBerry OS, and the other major players support the same technology. All I see here is Mozilla spending a lot of time and effort on a product that's seeing very little adoption, while only being able to do a fraction of what its competitors are able to do. That's just not a way to gain influence, and it's not a way to maintain whatever influence they still have thanks to their success with Firefox in the distant past.