To say that this is a lame piece is an understatement. He complains that although Gawker linked to his piece twice or more times, and drove significant traffic

To say that this is a lame piece is an understatement. He complains that although Gawker linked to his piece twice or more times, and drove significant traffic to his article, that somehow the online world is driving newspapers to the wall. He complains that the extra traffic gave The Post no extra revenue? Oh c'mon, get real, whose fault is that? The real kicker is the fact that newspapers and the MSN in general are all engaged in a constant war to steal each others content and make it their own, they've been doing it for decades. And that's a fact. This article is pathetic, and really shows the desperate state of the MSM.