4 ms·
While I don't agree with the CEOs statement, I think people should be allowed to hire whoever they want. The trouble with this is that a set of biases can beco
by tbrownaw 13y ago
While I don't agree with the CEOs statement, I think people should be allowed to hire whoever they want.
The trouble with this is that a set of biases can become near-universal.
I have the right to associate (or not) with whoever I choose. But if everyone (or nearly everyone) choose not to associate with people from a particular group, that is harmful to society[1].
So, there are exceptions made to your freedom of association. IIRC these exceptions only apply to companies with more than 50 employees, which seems a decent balance between "we're all friends here" small/family businesses (individual rights win) vs "you are a cog in a wheel" megacorps (the good of society wins).
[1] For example, I understand that people refusing to hire ex-convicts is a significant contributor to recidivism.
- facepalm 13y agoI know there are such laws - not sure if I agree with them, but OK (literally not sure - maybe it is good, maybe not - to be sure I wouldn't like it if it were my own company). But how are they being enforced, with so many possible candidates? Disabled people, women, different ethnic backgrounds, different schools, ex-convicts... One you go over 50, you have to have at least one of each of them? Or if you hire employee 51 and the candidate is an ex-convict, you have to hire him?
- gizmo686 13y agoEconomic theory would suggest a limit on this effect with regards to hiring.