4 ms·

You did the right thing, IMO. Silence is tacitly condoning the status quo. Be the change you want to see, and when you're in a relative position of power (like

by Fomite 13y ago

You did the right thing, IMO. Silence is tacitly condoning the status quo. Be the change you want to see, and when you're in a relative position of power (like being able to turn down a job), do something.

Paul_S 13y ago
> You did the right thing, IMO. Silence is tacitly condoning the status quo. But that is what the author did - he didn't confront the CEO, nor did he name the company.
- Fomite 13y ago
  He told the company it was a reason he wasn't accepting. After the fact, I think that's still laudable.