> But you can't actually 'work on the same code'. You have to have a copy. Surely this is a little overly pedantic? The point is that you want developers A and

> But you can't actually 'work on the same code'. You have to have a copy. Surely this is a little overly pedantic? The point is that you want developers A and B to work on code bases that are as close to each other as possible, so that any problem in the interaction between these developers' work is caught early. Your project doesn't need to be completed in a day or two, you just need to accept that you have a dev branch which isn't always in a shippable state (which I think is usually unproblematic).