3 ms·
Calling it a "Magna Carta" is very appropriate from a historical perspective. That said, because of the perverse corruption in each country, I'm afraid it'd lo
by johnvschmitt 13y ago
Calling it a "Magna Carta" is very appropriate from a historical perspective.
That said, because of the perverse corruption in each country, I'm afraid it'd look like this:
USA Version:
People (=companies) have the right to protect their interests by suing/banning anyone who makes copies of any data.
People (=companies) have the right to innovate by throttling, or inspecting packets, to extort or ban competitors.
Other countries might have better versions, but the USA, through TPP, World Bank, Aid packages & other secret trade pacts will assert their version to be dominant.
We really need election finance reform before we can take actions. Until then, I'm kind of fine with gridlock, to slow the corruption down a bit.
- happyscrappy 13y ago>Other countries might have better versions, but the USA, through TPP, World Bank, Aid packages & other secret trade pacts will assert their version to be dominant. Europe's principles mean nothing if they don't stand up for them. Hell, Russia will take Crimea and Germany will barely bat an eyelash.
- kordless 13y agoIf you want to bridge borders, make it a cryptocurrency based contract.