How can you say that we don't have a strong enough welfare net with the amount of funding California dumps into it? "34% Of the nation’s welfare recipients live

How can you say that we don't have a strong enough welfare net with the amount of funding California dumps into it? "34% Of the nation’s welfare recipients live in California but only 12% of the U.S. population resides here". http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/Jul/28/welfare-capital-of-the-us/ http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/Jul/28/welfare-capital-o... Honestly if there were not so many social programs in SF the homeless population would be much lower as they would relocate to other less expensive areas and maybe actually be able to afford a place to live. The current social system in SF mixed with the crazy rent prices actually encourages homelessness. Even I can't afford to live in SF on "developer" pay, so guess what? I don't I live in SF, I moved south where I could find an apartment at a semi-sane price (still extreme, I could make payments on two Teslas for what I pay in rent).