Yeah, it's not very well thought-out. "The fact that patent holders are not required to go after the biggest perceived infringer or, more importantly, ALL infri

Yeah, it's not very well thought-out. "The fact that patent holders are not required to go after the biggest perceived infringer or, more importantly, ALL infringers, and unilaterally get to choose infringers further proves the illegitimacy of software patents in the first place." [emphasis mine]. That patent law doesn't include this thing he just thought up proves that they are illegitimate (whatever that means in this context)? It doesn't follow. Does the fact that copyright litigation not require you to go after the "biggest" infringers prove its illegitimacy?