4 ms·

I would rather not pay someone (in the form of higher gas prices) to do something that takes nearly no effort, and I can damn well do myself. Who is so lazy at

by JeffL 13y ago

I would rather not pay someone (in the form of higher gas prices) to do something that takes nearly no effort, and I can damn well do myself. Who is so lazy at they can't get out of their comfy seat for 2 minutes?

mullingitover 13y ago
> I would rather not pay someone (in the form of higher gas prices) to do something that takes nearly no effort Then you'd be happy to know that in addition to having full service, Oregon's gas prices are ~$.40 per gallon cheaper than California's. Full service doesn't seem to be resulting in dramatically higher prices. > Who is so lazy at they can't get out of their comfy seat for 2 minutes? Who doesn't have better things to do with their time than inhale gasoline fumes?
- abcabc321321123 13y ago
  That is not a fair comparison. California's gas tax (including excise tax) is higher than Oregon. In addition, California requires a more expensive blend of gasoline. A better comparison would be to a state that has similar taxes and gasoline requirements. As a bonus, the availability of refineries is a significant factor in gasoline prices.
- smackfu 13y ago
  Same thing in NJ. And no one thinks prices would go down if they got rid of full service, so what would be the point?
- ericd 13y ago
  That additional cost is probably gas tax, so instead of going towards paying a group of people to waste their time doing something trivial, that money is going to pay for freeway maintenance, etc.
  - mullingitover 13y ago
    > That additional cost is probably gas tax California's gas tax is ~$.70 per gallon, Oregon is ~$.50. Now granted, California has roughly 3x the miles of roadway that Oregon has...[1] This probably explains why California's roads are atrociously bad and Oregon's are relatively pristine. [1] http://blog.cubitplanning.com/2010/02/road-miles-by-state/ http://blog.cubitplanning.com/2010/02/road-miles-by-state/
    - saryant 13y ago
      The difference isn't just in taxes. California has an artificially restricted supply of gasoline because it requires a specific formula (ostensibly to reduce emissions) and only six or seven refineries are equipped to meet that regulation. Oregon's standards allow it to buy from a far larger market.
      - ericd 13y ago
        Ah, good to know! Makes a lot of sense. Do you know if it actually does reduce emissions?
        saryant 13y ago
        I don't know. This is actually one area where the refining industry wants federal regulation: they would vastly prefer to deal with a single set of standards for the whole country than tailoring individual plants to 50 different standards.
        maxerickson 13y ago
        There are minimum federal standards: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/gasolinefuels/rfg/areas.htm http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/gasolinefuels/rfg/areas.htm So the state specific requirements only really matter if they exceed the federal standards. It's pretty likely that reformulated gasoline is effective in reducing smog (I think CO is the big target).
        13y ago
  - pbreit 13y ago
    I thought you were going to say: "instead of paying a local working human being providing a decent service, that money goes down the government rathole".
    - ericd 13y ago
      It's not a decent service, though. It's a service not many want to pay extra for. Personally I would even pay a bit extra to be able to pump my own gas. It certainly doesn't save me any time to have them pump it for me, and it's awkward to boot. There's no shortage of things they could be doing, but instead, we're paying them to stand around most of the time inhaling gasoline fumes. We could instead be paying those people to do something actually useful, like running fiber to homes and businesses, or delivering goods so that we don't have to travel, or a million other things that would increase our productivity.
- w1ntermute 13y ago
  > Then you'd be happy to know that in addition to having full service, Oregon's gas prices are ~$.40 per gallon cheaper than California's. Full service doens't seem to be resulting in dramatically higher prices. And now you're being willfully ignorant. California has a variety of other regulations that lead to higher prices. But that doesn't change the fact that Oregon's gas-pumping regulation also leads to higher gas prices.
- poulsbohemian 13y ago
  I live just over the Washington border in the eastern part of the state and go to Oregon frequently. Same situation as you've found compared to California - Oregon is normally $0.10 or so cheaper per gallon. Often the attendants will wipe your windshield, check your wipers, tell you the sports score and weather, etc. It's rather charming really. Even when I was in Portland on business, I don't think I ever viewed it as taking any longer for the attendant to do it over what it would have taken me. If you really want to do it yourself, you can get a commercial fuel membership and pump away at those stations.

by JeffL 13y ago

mullingitover 13y ago

> I would rather not pay someone (in the form of higher gas prices) to do something that takes nearly no effort Then you'd be happy to know that in addition to having full service, Oregon's gas prices are ~$.40 per gallon cheaper than California's. Full service doesn't seem to be resulting in dramatically higher prices. > Who is so lazy at they can't get out of their comfy seat for 2 minutes? Who doesn't have better things to do with their time than inhale gasoline fumes?

abcabc321321123 13y ago
That is not a fair comparison. California's gas tax (including excise tax) is higher than Oregon. In addition, California requires a more expensive blend of gasoline. A better comparison would be to a state that has similar taxes and gasoline requirements. As a bonus, the availability of refineries is a significant factor in gasoline prices.
smackfu 13y ago
Same thing in NJ. And no one thinks prices would go down if they got rid of full service, so what would be the point?
ericd 13y ago
That additional cost is probably gas tax, so instead of going towards paying a group of people to waste their time doing something trivial, that money is going to pay for freeway maintenance, etc.
- mullingitover 13y ago
  > That additional cost is probably gas tax California's gas tax is ~$.70 per gallon, Oregon is ~$.50. Now granted, California has roughly 3x the miles of roadway that Oregon has...[1] This probably explains why California's roads are atrociously bad and Oregon's are relatively pristine. [1] http://blog.cubitplanning.com/2010/02/road-miles-by-state/ http://blog.cubitplanning.com/2010/02/road-miles-by-state/
  - saryant 13y ago
    The difference isn't just in taxes. California has an artificially restricted supply of gasoline because it requires a specific formula (ostensibly to reduce emissions) and only six or seven refineries are equipped to meet that regulation. Oregon's standards allow it to buy from a far larger market.
    - ericd 13y ago
      Ah, good to know! Makes a lot of sense. Do you know if it actually does reduce emissions?
      - saryant 13y ago
        I don't know. This is actually one area where the refining industry wants federal regulation: they would vastly prefer to deal with a single set of standards for the whole country than tailoring individual plants to 50 different standards.
        maxerickson 13y ago
        There are minimum federal standards: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/gasolinefuels/rfg/areas.htm http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/gasolinefuels/rfg/areas.htm So the state specific requirements only really matter if they exceed the federal standards. It's pretty likely that reformulated gasoline is effective in reducing smog (I think CO is the big target).
        13y ago
- pbreit 13y ago
  I thought you were going to say: "instead of paying a local working human being providing a decent service, that money goes down the government rathole".
  - ericd 13y ago
    It's not a decent service, though. It's a service not many want to pay extra for. Personally I would even pay a bit extra to be able to pump my own gas. It certainly doesn't save me any time to have them pump it for me, and it's awkward to boot. There's no shortage of things they could be doing, but instead, we're paying them to stand around most of the time inhaling gasoline fumes. We could instead be paying those people to do something actually useful, like running fiber to homes and businesses, or delivering goods so that we don't have to travel, or a million other things that would increase our productivity.
w1ntermute 13y ago
> Then you'd be happy to know that in addition to having full service, Oregon's gas prices are ~$.40 per gallon cheaper than California's. Full service doens't seem to be resulting in dramatically higher prices. And now you're being willfully ignorant. California has a variety of other regulations that lead to higher prices. But that doesn't change the fact that Oregon's gas-pumping regulation also leads to higher gas prices.
poulsbohemian 13y ago
I live just over the Washington border in the eastern part of the state and go to Oregon frequently. Same situation as you've found compared to California - Oregon is normally $0.10 or so cheaper per gallon. Often the attendants will wipe your windshield, check your wipers, tell you the sports score and weather, etc. It's rather charming really. Even when I was in Portland on business, I don't think I ever viewed it as taking any longer for the attendant to do it over what it would have taken me. If you really want to do it yourself, you can get a commercial fuel membership and pump away at those stations.