3 ms·
You have to be willing to lose in life. It's unrealistic to expect all hits all the time. If some organization or open source project seems too perfect, look fo
by BrendanEich 13y ago
You have to be willing to lose in life. It's unrealistic to expect all hits all the time. If some organization or open source project seems too perfect, look for a "memory hole" where their negative results get flushed.
So XULRunner and Tamarin did not pan out. But we have lots of hits, some still ramping up: Firefox, Firefox OS, Gecko, Servo, Rust, Fennec, various SpiderMonkey iterations including OdinMonkey for Emscripten/asm.js, PDF.js, Shumway.
Negative results are important in science, as roc blogged once (he cited a "Journal of Negative Results", in one of the physical sciences I think). Let's learn from them and make better results, not deny that they happen or keep on banging heads against stout oak trees....
- ondras 13y agoFor me, XULRunner is a big success. I use it to run my own xul-based file manager (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/fire-commander/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/fire-commande...) and I definitely want this tech to stay alive and rocking!
- BrendanEich 13y agoFair enough, and godspeed. But it's not a product, and it won't be a big consumer platform. We've fed "XUL, the good parts" into the web standards, e.g., flexible box in CSS; and still are, e.g., Web Components. /be