4 ms·
Great game! Love the simplicity! I played a round, and got to 512. But toward the end I wasn't sure if I was actually playing with a strategy, or just pressing
by Ethan_Mick 13y ago
Great game! Love the simplicity!
I played a round, and got to 512. But toward the end I wasn't sure if I was actually playing with a strategy, or just pressing buttons randomly with some thinking involved.
So I built a script to randomly press the arrow keys[0]! I let it play a few games, and the highest it got to was 128 before consistently losing. So I guess you'll need some decent strategy to get to 2048.
0 - https://gist.github.com/Wayfarer247/9469272 https://gist.github.com/Wayfarer247/9469272
- lifeformed 13y ago> So I built a script to randomly press the arrow keys[0]! I let it play a few games, and the highest it got to was 128 before consistently losing. So I guess you'll need some decent strategy to get to 2048. That's a great idea for testing the depth of simple games. It's good to know a baseline score: players should be getting to the 128 tile or better, or else they're doing really bad.
- thronoprocrast 13y agoLosing that early could be almost as impressive as winning. Think about how hard it would be to miss every question on a multiple choice test.
- BoppreH 13y agoIf you remove one key it'll get to 256. I removed the `down` key and larger blocks started gathering on top, which was advantageous.