11 ms·
Right now there are around 2100 people on the site and an average visit duration of around 4 minutes :)
by terabytest 13y ago
Right now there are around 2100 people on the site and an average visit duration of around 4 minutes :)
- deletes 13y agoHow many reached 2048?
- terabytest 13y agoThe latest stats show no "game-win" events :P It might just be a matter of time though. EDIT: oops, there was a bug in the win/lose tracking so I probably missed out on a few wins. I fixed it now, so it should hopefully track it if someone else wins!
- yeldarb 13y agoI just beat it! First try.. but I've been addicted to Threes for the past week or so. http://i.imgur.com/nf25AVZ.png http://i.imgur.com/nf25AVZ.png
- deletes 13y agoI'm gonna call fake on this one.
- anon4 13y agoWith enough tries anything is possible. There is probably even a person who ascended nethack on his first try (using the wiki of course, we're still talking things with p > 0) and didn't play it again because it's too easy and boring.
- eru 13y agoI've seen that. Wiki, #nethack, valkyrie, and some decent but not extraordinary luck.
- araes 13y agoThere's actually a semi-optimal strategy that nearly guarantees winning if you're diligent about it. Just build a stairstep pattern with the highest numbers in the bottom corner of the stairs. Then basically combine sideways and downward and "always" resist the temptation to push up. Its kind of how some tri-diagonal matrix algorithms work. The only problem is you have to be fastidious about never using the one direction you've reserved as your excluded case (Up in my example) as that can screw your staircase by putting a [2] right underneath your wonderful [1024]. Just move blocks back and forth, waiting for the right blocks to create combo patterns, while generally storing lower cost blocks on the outside of the stairs, and then snake them through the stairs when you get a chain set up. Ex: x x x 2 x x 2 4 x 2 4 8 2 4 8 16
- kyle_t 13y agoI was surprised at how well that worked. I was basically blindly cycling between left,down,right (with one accidental up) and got to 1024 on my first try.
- varyform 13y agofunction press(key) { var eventObj = document.createEvent("Events"); eventObj.initEvent("keydown", true, true); eventObj.which = key; document.dispatchEvent(eventObj); } for (y=0; y<=1000; y++) { press(39); //right press(40); //down press(37); //left press(40); //down } this gave me 1024 in couple of tries :D http://i58.tinypic.com/am9sh4.png http://i58.tinypic.com/am9sh4.png
- wmblaettler 13y agoHere's a random key press loop: function press(key) { var eventObj = document.createEvent("Events"); eventObj.initEvent("keydown", true, true); eventObj.which = key; document.dispatchEvent(eventObj); } for (y=0; y<=1000; y++) { press(Math.floor(Math.random() * 4) + 37); }
- omegant 13y agoAfter half an hour playing blindly I realized this, but even using this it´s hard to go beyond 500
- terabytest 13y agoIf that's real, congrats! I had started doubting that anybody would ever win the game :P
- samstave 13y agoCan you add in how many moves!!?
- birdmanjeremy 13y agoThis would be cool. I think winning in the fewest moves would be the most impressive. i.e. how few tiles you 'waste'. Though winning with the lowest score may approximate this.
- duskwuff 13y agoEach turn, one 2 tile is added, and other tiles may be combined. So you can derive the move count by adding together the numbers on all the visible tiles and dividing by 2.
- jsmthrowaway 13y agoThis is inaccurate, because you have a 10% chance of getting a 4 tile added instead of a 2. That part makes the game tricky, because otherwise you could optimize every solution like an algorithm without ever losing. var value = Math.random() < 0.9 ? 2 : 4; https://github.com/gabrielecirulli/2048/blob/master/js/game_manager.js#L45 https://github.com/gabrielecirulli/2048/blob/master/js/game_...
- duskwuff 13y agoOh, huh, I didn't even realize it was doing that. Even so, the move count will still be roughly proportional to the sum of the board (plus or minus some random variation), won't it?
- samstave 13y agoThanks Neckbeard, I refuse to do these calculations in my head... The author should do this, and create a counter of moves within the app.
- louisremi 13y agoLooks legit
- guest 13y agoBeat it! http://screencast.com/t/2b3zNbYy6HDi http://screencast.com/t/2b3zNbYy6HDi
- glock18 13y agohttp://www.screencast.com/t/NYuiFDueop8 http://www.screencast.com/t/NYuiFDueop8 :P I guess it was almost perfect attempt, and the quickest of mine so far (just a single 16 apart of 2048)
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- sata-ata 13y agookay, and i win... and my record is 32768 score so what? it was fun) my screen: http://upload.freehacks.ru/MKPEP2 http://upload.freehacks.ru/MKPEP2 my implementation and guide you can found there: http://vk.cc/2nGPL3 http://vk.cc/2nGPL3
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- Leszek 13y agoAnd here's another win, took me a fair few hours though. http://imgur.com/9FckZVX http://imgur.com/9FckZVX
- cousin_it 13y agoI'd be interested in seeing the lowest winning score, highest winning score, and lowest losing score (!)
- rsvidal 13y agoManaged to purposefully lose with 627 points. Lowest I've managed to lose by. :)
- mschuster91 13y agoI did, with 23000 points.
- daleco 13y agoIt took me 2-3 hours on friday, and some luck :) http://imgur.com/PNRIfW6 http://imgur.com/PNRIfW6
- Chris_X 13y agoBeat the game: http://oi62.tinypic.com/2wdopq9.jpg http://oi62.tinypic.com/2wdopq9.jpg At least I don't have to spend any more time on it. My simple strategy was to keep the biggest blocks in a corner at all times.