The argument of the journalist would be that they do not report on trains that run on time: having an investor support the business he believes in, and would li

The argument of the journalist would be that they do not report on trains that run on time: having an investor support the business he believes in, and would like regulation to reflect that seems par for the course -- just like having business people grant campaign funds for politicians they support. On the other hand, the idea of having large and influential actors interested in the failure of an endeavor seems shocking and worth covering. It does lack a mention on the interests at stake, but I understand the angle on (nascent?) negativity in business.