3 ms·
Sounds interesting. Hopefully they will release more technical information about what makes it "archival" quality. Seems like a normal Blu-ray at first glance.
by nemasu 13y ago
Sounds interesting. Hopefully they will release more technical information about what makes it "archival" quality. Seems like a normal Blu-ray at first glance.
- robmcm 13y agoSounds like they have a disk with a large storage capacity and perhaps a slower read time and the marketing just did it's self. I would have imagined some special material that can last longer and is at lower risk from scratches...
- fur0n 13y agolike it says, higher capacity (300GB, 500GB, and 1TB) along with higher redundancy.
- deletes 13y agoBut they don't say how well it does, compared to the problem of cd/dvd, that fail to work after 10 years for no apparent reason( no visible physical damage ).