3 ms·
FWIW never knew there was an angument for under so this was worth the post. It's valid with small children, aggressive pets, and in-vehicle holsters.
by radley 13y ago
FWIW never knew there was an angument for under so this was worth the post. It's valid with small children, aggressive pets, and in-vehicle holsters.
- rdl 13y agoCats seem more than capable of shredding the entire roll in-situ even if it's "under".
- greglindahl 13y agoAll 3 references to the purported advantage of "under" with pets are not peer-reviewed publications. Anecdotes are not data!