3 ms·
Nice catch. I'm not so sure about: A simple fix will be just crawling the links without the request parameters so that we don’t have to suffer. Many links w
by dantiberian 13y ago
Nice catch. I'm not so sure about:
A simple fix will be just crawling the links without the request parameters so that we don’t have to suffer.
Many links would fail/have different content if the request parameters were removed from the URL. Perhaps the crawler could use some kind of reverse bloom filter [1] to be more careful/back off if it receives the same content from multiple URLs. However nothing is simple at Google scale so there are probably issues with this approach too.
[1]: http://www.somethingsimilar.com/2012/05/21/the-opposite-of-a-bloom-filter/ http://www.somethingsimilar.com/2012/05/21/the-opposite-of-a...
- est 13y agoYou can always change that to =image("http://targetname/1.jpg") =image("http://targetname/2.jpg") =image("http://targetname/3.jpg")
- robzyb 13y agoBut what if 2.jpg doesn't exist? Or is a trivially small file? The advantage of the querystring-method is that you can just find one suitable (i.e. huge) file and force Google to pull it down many times.