23 ms·
Yeah, with respect, I think you're being duped. What you're seeing is plain text being drawn as images, making you think the images are input. You only have t
by solipsism 13y ago
Yeah, with respect, I think you're being duped. What you're seeing is plain text being drawn as images, making you think the images are input. You only have to click the code to see the plain text (and its not pretty).
Not only have they not gone farther than others, I cant find a single instance of anything in WL that's not plainly plain text. They have interesting output, not particularly interesting input.
- pshc 13y agoDamn, that's too bad. Oh well. It's a closed source dead end anyway. Time to dust off the old side project.
- tluyben2 13y agoI think the great thing here is the output; better than anything we have in open source so far. I takes a very large amount of effort to make something like that for your language of choice. For the input I agree; it's text and not very nice.