4 ms·
Resource usage, responsiveness. They did a lot of good under the hood work with it. Just metro ... make all the good will that would have been won go to waste.
by venomsnake 13y ago
Resource usage, responsiveness. They did a lot of good under the hood work with it. Just metro ... make all the good will that would have been won go to waste.
- userbinator 13y agoTo do that, they've been removing features: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Windows_8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Win... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Windows_7 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Win... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Windows_Vista http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_features_removed_in_Win...
- venomsnake 13y agoProbably the only real performance hog here is the Aero Glass and maybe backup. I doubt that the other have any meaningful impact.
- mattgreenrocks 13y agoTwo gripes: Task manager just sits there awkwardly before appearing. Event viewer takes like five seconds to even be usable. They worked fine in Win2k; why are they so slow now?
- dangero 13y agoYes I was so mad when Windows 8 came out because of Metro and I thought if they had just released something that looked like Windows 7 and said, "We made it leaner, we cut the boot time by 40%. Shutdown is faster too and we made over 200 smaller improvements to make things easier." I would have happily said, "Where do I buy?"