That's exactly my point. A famous person has different rules and different problems in society. I don't think this article is meaningful or even about privacy i

That's exactly my point. A famous person has different rules and different problems in society. I don't think this article is meaningful or even about privacy in society. It is merely about privacy for people who live as entertainers. It has no points, only an observation or two. I find the notion ridiculous since the article didn't even attempt to make a connection between regular folk and their privacy concerns. It is about people with fake names getting recognized because they are making tons of money doing pornography and then complaining about awkward experiences associated. It has almost nothing to do with tech, online privacy expectations for regular people, or online privacy in general.