I noticed that the BSD 2 has a 'CANNOT' group that says: > Hold Liable > Describes the warranty and if the software/license owner can be charged for damages.

I noticed that the BSD 2 has a 'CANNOT' group that says: > Hold Liable > Describes the warranty and if the software/license owner can be charged for damages. which reads awkwardly. It's like someone was describing the category "Hold Liable" instead of what the BSD2 license says about liability. Most of the descriptions have this problem. Something like "The software/license owner can't be charged for damages or shortcomings." might flow better, though that implies having descriptions for both the positive and negative case. edit Oh, normally the descriptions are hidden (with scripts enabled). So it's as if I asked "what is it?" by clicking and the description is the answer. That makes more sense.