5 ms·

"iTunes" has no results. So I searched "Apple Terms" like the autocomplete suggests, and get "Nothing summarized yet". No "Fulltext" for that one either. Why su

"iTunes" has no results. So I searched "Apple Terms" like the autocomplete suggests, and get "Nothing summarized yet". No "Fulltext" for that one either. Why suggest it if you don't have it? I also can't click the back button from "https://tldrlegal.com/license/apple-terms-of-service#changesets/active" https://tldrlegal.com/license/apple-terms-of-service#changes..., it seems to send me right back to itself.

XiZhao 13y ago
Hey, tldrlegal creator here. Glad to see feedback popping on HN again! Here's some answers: 1. You're totally right about ToS. Tldrlegal was just code and OSS licenses for a while -- I just added terms of service and the apple tos today. They're in the autocomplete to just feature both types but you're right -- it's irresponsible to suggest that before it's ready. 2. The back button issue is just a redirect one from the js routing on that page. The reason is because it defaults to the first tab link, which is kept as an anchor for js-disabled loaders. Thanks for the notes!
- beggi 13y ago
  It's not just suggested as autocomplete, it's actually given as an example of a search on the front page, just FYI.
- quadrangle 13y ago
  Please don't just duplicate work that is already being done. Partner with http://tosdr.org/ http://tosdr.org/ instead
  - freudien 13y ago
    These are kids building this product in Silicon Valley. I'm surprised there isn't more work done already -- this industry is notorious for having operating inefficiencies. But hey, that's what a free market is, right? Let the market decide which competitor is best. These guys are funded and need to generate that return, right?
    - hugoroy 13y ago
      (ToS;DR project lead here) We’re a not-for-profit. And all our code is at https://github.com/tosdr/ https://github.com/tosdr/ I’m all fine to see other projects tackling the issue. But I’m not a big fan of closed-source services that exploit people’s participation. (Or maybe I completely miss the source code to tldrlegal.com, in such case I apologize! But then, don’t hide it ;-))
      - freudien 13y ago
        I was talking about the tl;dr guys :P

XiZhao 13y ago

Hey, tldrlegal creator here. Glad to see feedback popping on HN again! Here's some answers: 1. You're totally right about ToS. Tldrlegal was just code and OSS licenses for a while -- I just added terms of service and the apple tos today. They're in the autocomplete to just feature both types but you're right -- it's irresponsible to suggest that before it's ready. 2. The back button issue is just a redirect one from the js routing on that page. The reason is because it defaults to the first tab link, which is kept as an anchor for js-disabled loaders. Thanks for the notes!

beggi 13y ago
It's not just suggested as autocomplete, it's actually given as an example of a search on the front page, just FYI.
quadrangle 13y ago
Please don't just duplicate work that is already being done. Partner with http://tosdr.org/ http://tosdr.org/ instead
- freudien 13y ago
  These are kids building this product in Silicon Valley. I'm surprised there isn't more work done already -- this industry is notorious for having operating inefficiencies. But hey, that's what a free market is, right? Let the market decide which competitor is best. These guys are funded and need to generate that return, right?
  - hugoroy 13y ago
    (ToS;DR project lead here) We’re a not-for-profit. And all our code is at https://github.com/tosdr/ https://github.com/tosdr/ I’m all fine to see other projects tackling the issue. But I’m not a big fan of closed-source services that exploit people’s participation. (Or maybe I completely miss the source code to tldrlegal.com, in such case I apologize! But then, don’t hide it ;-))
    - freudien 13y ago
      I was talking about the tl;dr guys :P