5 ms·
There's a lot of guessing and conjecture about how IBM deals with patents, so I thought I'd write a new parent thread to discuss. I worked at IBM for 7 years,
by bluedevil2k 13y ago
There's a lot of guessing and conjecture about how IBM deals with patents, so I thought I'd write a new parent thread to discuss.
I worked at IBM for 7 years, leaving many years ago. I am an IBM Master Inventor, having 36 patents filed with the USPTO with my name on them (some are still winding their way through the system). I worked heavily on patents for 3 years, and the last 2 years I was there, I was on the Patent Review Board. I'd also estimate during my active time with patents, I submitted 250-300 patent ideas to the board.
The Patent Review Board is organized along technologies - so, mobile would have its own Patent Review Board. People on the Patent Review Board tend to be Master Inventors and others who are active in the patent process. Once a week, about 3-4 hours of presentations are made to the Board (which includes the patent lawyers as well). After a 5-10 minute presentation, they are asked to leave the room, and the Board votes whether it should continue to the lawyer, or whether to close it. Most obviously are closed at this step with prior art. If it's voted to go to the lawyers, in my background, there was a pretty good chance it was going to get filed.
If your patent got filed with the USPTO, you got a point. IBM is very generous with their patent bonuses. You get $750 per patent filed. You also get an additional $1500 on your first patent filing, and $1500 every 3 after that. So, effectively, about $1000 per patent.
Patent ideas could be anything and everything. If they could patent it, they would. I remember from my time on the board seeing ideas on everything from dog doors to server optimization techniques to music devices. Given the people who work at IBM, most tended to be tech related, but it definitely was not a requirement at all.
The stuff people have asked about royalties makes me laugh as well - I never got the feeling once they cared if your patent would make them $1B or $1. And they certainly didn't care about compensating us for an idea that could make $1B. I was awarded the Software Group Patent of the Year one year, and other than an email denoting that fact, nothing was different than some of the lame ones I had filed.
Overall though, I thoroughly enjoyed every aspect of the patent process at IBM - it was one of the few outlets that rewarded creativity and hard work at the company.
- balls187 13y agoWhat you wrote underscores how the patent process is flawed. IBM abused the spirit of patents for their own financial gain.
- broodbucket 13y ago>A company did something to make money Stop the presses!
- balls187 13y agoStopped. Now what?
- ipValue 13y agoThis is a good way for a company to amass tons of low quality patents. After a few years, the maintenance fees start to drag them down. IBM sold some of these crap assets to Twitter to avoid paying $9.9m in maintenance fees over the next 10 years.