3 ms·
A specific thing I haven't seen anyone mention is that NaN is equal to NaN in this, which is quite different from IEEE FP. Although it's a thing that often seem
by stormbrew 13y ago
A specific thing I haven't seen anyone mention is that NaN is equal to NaN in this, which is quite different from IEEE FP. Although it's a thing that often seems counterintuitive at first glance, doesn't this kind of ruin the error-taint quality of NaN?
- ErsatzVerkehr 13y agoAlso, he defines 0*NaN=0, but 0+NaN=NaN.
- p0nce 13y agoSo that you can divide by 0, get a NaN, then multiply by 0 to make it disappear!